gtsoft/gtsoft-snail-job-server
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects 1 Releases Wiki Activity

fix(sj_1.1.0-beta2): 修复存在阻塞的节点，还能正常往后流转的问题

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
opensnail 2024-07-01 18:19:51 +08:00
parent fda6fda5b1
commit e73790bb64
1 changed files with 21 additions and 24 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

45
snail-job-server/snail-job-server-job-task/src/main/java/com/aizuda/snailjob/server/job/task/support/dispatch/WorkflowExecutorActor.java
View File

@ -158,16 +158,16 @@ public class WorkflowExecutorActor extends AbstractActor {
WorkflowNode parentWorkflowNode = workflowNodeMap.get(taskExecute.getParentId());
// 失败策略处理
if (CollUtil.isNotEmpty(parentJobTaskBatchList)
&& parentJobTaskBatchList.stream()
.map(JobTaskBatch::getTaskBatchStatus)
.anyMatch(i -> i != JobTaskBatchStatusEnum.SUCCESS.getStatus())) {
// 根据失败策略判断是否继续处理
if (Objects.equals(parentWorkflowNode.getFailStrategy(), FailStrategyEnum.BLOCK.getCode())) {
return;
}
}
// if (CollUtil.isNotEmpty(parentJobTaskBatchList)
// && parentJobTaskBatchList.stream()
// .map(JobTaskBatch::getTaskBatchStatus)
// .anyMatch(i -> i != JobTaskBatchStatusEnum.SUCCESS.getStatus())) {
//
// // 根据失败策略判断是否继续处理
// if (Objects.equals(parentWorkflowNode.getFailStrategy(), FailStrategyEnum.BLOCK.getCode())) {
// return;
// }
// }
// 决策节点
if (Objects.nonNull(parentWorkflowNode)
@ -181,11 +181,6 @@ public class WorkflowExecutorActor extends AbstractActor {
// 过滤掉非当前决策节点【ParentId】的子节点
&& successors.contains(workflowNode.getId())).collect(Collectors.toList());
} else {
// TODO 不通过兄弟节点去控制是否执行后续节点
// if (!brotherNodeIsComplete(taskExecute, brotherNode, jobTaskBatchMap, parentWorkflowNode)) {
// return;
// }
workflowNodes = workflowNodes.stream()
// 去掉父节点
.filter(workflowNode -> !workflowNode.getId().equals(taskExecute.getParentId()))
@ -214,7 +209,7 @@ public class WorkflowExecutorActor extends AbstractActor {
// 决策当前节点要不要执行
Set<Long> predecessors = graph.predecessors(workflowNode.getId());
boolean predecessorsComplete = arePredecessorsComplete(taskExecute, predecessors, jobTaskBatchMap,
workflowNode);
workflowNode, workflowNodeMap);
if (!SystemConstants.ROOT.equals(taskExecute.getParentId()) && !predecessorsComplete) {
continue;
}
@ -268,10 +263,8 @@ public class WorkflowExecutorActor extends AbstractActor {
}
private boolean arePredecessorsComplete(final WorkflowNodeTaskExecuteDTO taskExecute, Set<Long> predecessors,
Map<Long, List<JobTaskBatch>> jobTaskBatchMap, WorkflowNode waitExecWorkflowNode) {
Map<Long, List<JobTaskBatch>> jobTaskBatchMap, WorkflowNode waitExecWorkflowNode, Map<Long, WorkflowNode> workflowNodeMap) {
// 是否存在无需处理的节点
List<JobTaskBatch> isExistedNotSkipJobTaskBatches = new ArrayList<>();
// 判断所有节点是否都完成
for (final Long nodeId : predecessors) {
if (SystemConstants.ROOT.equals(nodeId)) {
@ -295,13 +288,17 @@ public class WorkflowExecutorActor extends AbstractActor {
return Boolean.FALSE;
}
if (CollUtil.isEmpty(isExistedNotSkipJobTaskBatches)) {
isExistedNotSkipJobTaskBatches = jobTaskBatches.stream().filter(
jobTaskBatch -> !WORKFLOW_SUCCESSOR_SKIP_EXECUTION.contains(jobTaskBatch.getOperationReason()))
.toList();
// 父节点只要有一个是失败的且失败策略是阻塞的则当前节点不处理
if (jobTaskBatches.stream()
.map(JobTaskBatch::getTaskBatchStatus)
.anyMatch(i -> i != JobTaskBatchStatusEnum.SUCCESS.getStatus())) {
WorkflowNode preWorkflowNode = workflowNodeMap.get(nodeId);
// 根据失败策略判断是否继续处理
if (Objects.equals(preWorkflowNode.getFailStrategy(), FailStrategyEnum.BLOCK.getCode())) {
return Boolean.FALSE;
}
}
}
return Boolean.TRUE;